Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 13:31

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What are some other ways to say "you're welcome" in French besides "de rien"?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Death Stranding 2 Is Causing Some PS5s to Overheat - Push Square
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
35 Father’s Day Gifts For Anyone Who Still Doesn’t Know What The Heck To Get Their Dad - BuzzFeed
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, plans more than $105m in reparations for America's 'hidden' massacre - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Chrysler Is 100 Years Old, and It's 'Back On,' Stellantis Design Boss Gilles Says - Road & Track